Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Constuctionism, Constuctivism, and Technology


What is the difference between constructionism and constructivism? Well if you are anything like me then you are asking yourself this question a lot! Although they sound and look the same, they are different in when it comes to learning. Michael Orey describes constructivism as a theory of knowledge while constructionism is described as a theory of learning (Laureate Education Inc., 2010). In simpler terms, constructivism allows students to construct his or her own meaning while learning and the theory of constructionism allows students to learn while they creating.


One instructional strategy that correlates with constructivism and constructionism is generating and testing hypotheses. Authors Pitler, Hubell, Kuhn, and Malenoski (2007) explain “when students generate and test hypotheses they are engaging in complex mental processes, applying content knowledge, and enhancing their overall understanding of the content” (Pitler, Hubell, Kuhn, and Malenoski, 2007 pg. 202). Technology can play a big role in generating and testing hypotheses. Though this instructional strategy seems to work better with older students it can be adapted for younger children, especially in science. Also, this theory correlates with constructionism and constructivism in that the children become the investigators. They would able to construct meaning and engage in the creation of an artifact.


 Having the children participate in project based lessons will allow them to be actively engaged. When related to real-world experiences, learning is enhanced and becomes more meaningful for students. Lastly, as Orey mentioned in Constructionism, Learning by Design, and Project Based Learning, “PBL learning advantages, increased motivation, increased problem solving, improved research skills, and increased collaboration” (Orey, 2001). So I guess, overall, my question for you is, what are you waiting for?


Resources:

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2010). [Webcast]. Constructionist and constructivist learning theories. Baltimore: Laureate Media.

 Orey, M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD






4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Melissa,
I found a lot of good research on Project-based Learning (PBL) on the Buck Institute for Education's website (http://www.bie.org/). They have videos, planners, and information about PBL that explain ways educators can use this technique in their teaching. The site explains the elements needed to create a good PBL lesson such as using in-depth student inquiry to make content significant (http://www.bie.org/about/what_is_pbl).

Does your building use much project-based learning?

Melissa said...

Hi Jodi,

Our 4th and 5th grade classrooms are split. There are PBL classrooms and then there are regular classrooms. They use PBL more than anyone else in the building. Third grade is starting to develop activities that are more PBL centered as well. I think it is so neat when I walk down the hallway and see the groups all working together. It is definitely a meaningful learning experience when they are all working with one another.

rachierach19 said...

Project based learning is a fun way of teaching that is benefitial to our students. They are really learning how to manage their time and be responsible for their own learning. If you think about it this is a very valuable skill we are teaching our students.

Melissa said...

You are right Rachel, PBL experiences can be very valuable for students. It really makes them think outside of the box. Just out of curioustiry Rachel, how have you incorporated PBL into your classroom? I know you are a Physical Education teacher so I was curious how that works for you.

Post a Comment